Key transfer pricing considerations for startups
Transfer pricing
Key transfer pricing considerations for startups
Thu 04 Nov 2021
Startups and entrepreneurship are concepts that have recently grown more important globally. To put it simply, startups are entrepreneurial companies that are generally established to offer solutions to any problem and exhibit rapid growth potential. In many countries, the importance of technology-oriented startup business models is gradually increasing, and a rising number of “unicorns”[1] are emerging. Companies such as Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Xiaomi, Airbnb, and SpaceX, each a multinational giant now, were initially startups.
Transfer pricing is tax legislation setting out methods for the pricing of transactions between group companies according to their contributions to the group and relies upon the OECD’s “arm’s length principle”. The sensitivity of tax authorities to the intentional manipulation of pricing among MNEs by group companies and the erosion of countries’ tax base is gradually increasing.
The rapid and aggressive growth momentum of startups, particularly due to increased investment, means their financial and tax systems can quickly become overwhelmed. At these stages, startups need consultancy on tax and financial matters. In this blog post, we discuss the critical transfer pricing issues relevant to startups, from the establishment and investment stages through to the later stages of the enterprise. This should be a top priority for enterprises looking to gain an international dimension.
I. Seed investment phase
This is the initial phase when startups are showcased for corporate investors. It is considered to be decisive for the future of an enterprise. . However, startups must meet multiple criteria to attract investment from corporate or other investors. An essential standard is a successful completion by such companies of a special analysis called “due diligence”. To successfully complete financial and tax due diligence processes, startups are expected to minimise their tax risks before and during the seed phase.
Startups should consider the factors described below when developing transfer pricing policies that cater to the company’s current and potential growth, thus helping to manage and minimise tax risks.
1.1 Value chain analysis and value creation concept
In essence, the concept of “added value” can be defined as the difference between the value of inputs and the value of outputs. Although the concept seems simple and easy to apply, it is often difficult to determine the value applicable to each element of the chain, particularly where there are high value-added components in the chain.
Today, companies operating in multiple countries, undertake high risks, set and implement strategic goals, form highly-specialised teams worldwide, and develop market and bargaining power in excess of that possible by a disparate group of individuals. Without a specific definition and transfer pricing analyses applying OECD principles, the value creation process may conclude that most of the added value is produced in R&D and marketing departments, and minimal value is attributed to corporate functions managed centrally that can make a significant contribution to R&D and marketing activities.
Therefore, it is important to determine precisely which activity contributes most to value-added functions in order to correctly apply transfer pricing principles to transactions between group companies. Group companies that undertake significant business risks and own significant tangible and intangible assets can be expected to earn higher returns than other companies.
Another issue that entrepreneurs should consider is that “post box companies/shell companies” are now becoming history, thanks to the BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) action plans implemented under the leadership of the OECD and G20 countries. Previously, companies were able to establish post-box companies in so called “tax havens” and engage in related transactions with such companies. However, in the post-BEPS world, the commercial and economic substance of these artificial structures are now in question. Therefore, we think it would be right for startups to consider substance and form when deciding on the related party transactions with these companies.
1.2 Creation and ownership of intangible rights
According to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (“OECD TP Guidelines”), intangible rights are defined as assets that are owned and used commercially, that can be transferred by an independent person, and are priced similarly, although they are not physical or financial assets. According to the TP Guidelines, for an asset to be considered an intangible right, it does not need to be registered or included in the balance sheet of companies. The intangible rights explained in the OECD TP Guidelines are listed below:
- Patents;
- Know-how and trade secrets;
- Trade names and trademarks;
- Concessions and contractual licenses;
- Goodwill and ongoing concern value.
According to the OECD TP Guidelines, the legal ownership of intangible rights by businesses will not be sufficient on its own for them to receive a profit share in respect of the intangible asset. Accordingly, the functions assumed between the related parties, the risks assumed, and the assets used are key in determining the arm’s length value to be applied in the transfer of intangible rights and related rewards among the related parties. Five major concepts (DEMPE functions) regarding intangible rights are established in the transfer pricing literature:
- Development;
- Enhancement;
- Maintenance;
- Protection;
- Exploitation.
A common feature of startups is that they try to establish their brand for rapid growth, particularly by using the technological infrastructure. Since the country in which intangible rights such as a trademark, patent, or know-how is developed, and the ownership of such rights are essential, both the location where the DEMPE functions are performed and the country holding intangible rights should be analysed. It is key that the allocation of reward should reflect the economic and commercial substance of what is actually going on. As there is often a large element of judgment in determining these allocations, startups should be aware that intragroup transactions relating to intangibles are likely to be challenged.
1.3 Significant people function
While analysing transactions between group companies in terms of transfer pricing, another major point to consider is the group company in which key executives work. These individuals can add significant value to the organisation and their activity is termed as “significant people functions (SPFs)”. Key executives refer to the employees who have the capacity to directly affect the profits of the company, for example, the founder, CEO (mostly, the founder may be the CEO), CTO, and Marketing Directors.
Startups are usually established with a very small number of key individuals such as the idea owner and a technical manager. The number of employees increases in direct proportion to the transaction volume. Although the number of employees rises with the company’s growth, the number of key executives generally remains limited. Therefore, the group company in which these people work deserves attention. It should be considered that the international relocation of a person such as the CEO or CTO would bring about significant changes in the structure of the TP policy of the group. If these people serve multiple group companies and an integrated business model exists, profit sharing methods can be developed that reflect the structure and location of related party transactions via a scoring system.
II. Conclusion
Although startups are commonplace in today’s commercial environment, they struggle with many challenges including the capital, investor, and cost pressure. On the other hand, they can grow rapidly through incoming investments and quickly launching operations in multiple countries. Such businesses need to create robust transfer pricing models, with the help of seasoned consultants, to minimise tax risks that may limit incoming investments or result in a confrontation with tax administrations in the countries in which they operate.
[1] “Unicorn” refers to privately held ventures with a value exceeding $ 1 billion
Want to get notified when new blog posts are published?
Subscribe 
Transfer pricing legislation in the Republic of Moldova
For the first time, the Republic of Moldova has introduced the Tax Code provisions on transfer pricing and the arm’s length principle. These measures are expected to apply from 1 January 2024, with an aim to bring local legislation closer to both the EU law and the recommendations of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and […]
ESG and financial transactions from a transfer pricing perspective
In 2021, the European Central Bank (ECB) published its final guide on climate-related and environmental risks for banks. It aimed at enhancing the industry’s awareness and preparedness for managing climate-related and environmental risks. The risks mentioned are commonly related to two main types: physical risk and transition risk. They have an impact on both economic […]
Protecting reputation and managing communication on tax matters for ESG ratings and Pillar 2 disclosures
Over the last decade, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU) have made significant developments regarding tax transparency regimes and the exchange of information between tax authorities. However, these developments are being taken further in the drive for increased transparency and public availability of such information, particularly in relation […]
What is the future of taxation in Europe: questioning the usefulness of all anti-avoidance measures
Pillar 2, which is the Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules (GloBE) minimum tax project, and the BEFIT initiatives are considered likely to reduce some tax planning opportunities respectively at worldwide and EU levels, and thus reduce the need to address them through anti-avoidance rules. Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider whether all these anti-avoidance rules […]
What is the future of taxation in Europe: impact on multinational enterprises
Initiatives mentioned in the previous article already affect and will further affect multinational companies in a significant way. The first step for multinational companies to consider is how to build stakeholders’ understanding of the impact these changes in domestic legislation will have on the business. In the case of Pillar 2, for example, this means […]
What is the future of taxation in Europe: state of play for ongoing initiatives
The international tax landscape has undergone major changes over the past few years which is set to have a significant impact on the overall tax architecture. At both international and European Union (EU) levels, several initiatives have been pursued aimed at aligning tax collection with the location of economic activity and achieve a minimum level […]
The impact of rising interest rates on transfer pricing
With rising inflation and multiple key interest rate increases, multinational enterprises should consider reviewing the prices of their intercompany financing transactions, which may no longer align with the arm’s length principle. The quick rise in interest rates may have created significant divergence between the prices applied by a multinational enterprise on its intercompany financing transactions […]
Where is the UK Diverted Profits Tax and the Profit Diversion Compliance Facility now?
On 7 February 2023, the UK tax authority HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) released its Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits tax statistics for the 2021 – 2022 tax year. The statistics clearly demonstrate that both transfer pricing and Diverted Profits Tax (DPT) continue to yield significant income for HMRC and that these areas are likely […]
Can Turkey make progress on transfer pricing audits?
National differences and approaches to transfer pricing are evident all over the world. In particular, tax jurisdictions in developed countries have now taken quite advanced steps in approaching complex transfer pricing situations from a technical debate perspective. Whereas in some countries, including Turkey, the concept of transfer pricing could be more advanced. Although Turkey has […]
Latest development of APA in China – simplified procedures of unilateral APA
Background The State Administration of Taxation (“STA”) has made a continuous effort to promote Advanced Pricing Arrangement (“APA”). On 26 July 2021, the STA issued STA Public Notice [2021] No.241 (“Bulletin 24”), which sets forth simplified procedures for unilateral APA for enterprises that meet certain conditions. On 29 October 2021, it also published the China […]
New CEE tax guide outlines fundamental changes and long-term trends
Providing information on taxation in 22 Central and Eastern European (CEE) states, the latest Mazars CEE tax guide analyses long-term taxation trends and fundamental tax regime changes in each country, both now and in previous years.
The Google tax: The UK story, 7 years later
The Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), or what the media have dubbed the Google tax, was introduced in 2015 to dissuade and counteract contrived arrangements used by large multinational groups that divert profits from the UK and erode the UK tax base.
New Transfer Pricing Bill Passed in Israel
Transfer Pricing Bill in Israel passes third reading in June 2022 and is approved. What are the implications for businesses in Israel? In June 2022, the new transfer pricing bill was approved. This is another step towards the Israel Tax Authorities (ITA) efforts to streamline the ITA’s supervision and control of transfer pricing relating to […]
Questions raised on Italy’s penalty protection regime
Following Italy’s new transfer pricing (TP) requirements1 introduced on 23 November 2020, there has been much discussion as to whether the taxpayer may benefit from penalty protection that also covers additional withholding tax otherwise due when the Italian tax authorities (ITA) perform adjustments that recharacterise the nature of a transaction. A Circular2 letter was then […]
Are you ready for the GloBE tax challenges?
On 14 March 2022, the OECD published a comprehensive commentary and illustrative examples of how implementing the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (GloBE rules) could look. In this blog, we discuss the GloBE rules and examine how the rules apply and filing requirements. On 20 December 2021, the OECD published model rules that member countries […]
Turkey issued the first legislation in relation to the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP)
With Law No. 7338 on Turkish Tax Procedure Law (TPL) and Amending Certain Laws (“Law No. 7338”) published in the Official Gazette dated October 26, 2021, a domestic regulation was made for the first time regarding the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) in Turkey. The Turkish Revenue Administration (TRA) aims to eliminate uncertainties regarding the application […]
What to expect from South Africa’s advance pricing agreement programme
A proposed model for establishing an advance pricing agreement (“APA”) programme in South Africa (“SA”) was issued by the South African Revenue Authority (“SARS”) during December 2021. This article highlights some notable aspects of this proposed programme, by comparing it to those of other jurisdictions. An APA is an agreement between a taxpayer and a […]
Takeaways from the latest edition of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines
On 20 January 2022, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released the 2022 edition of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (OECD TPG). This blog provides a summary of the revised Chapters of the OECD TPG, and highlights what tax advisors and taxpayers need to know. The revised […]
Transfer pricing: is Africa ready for advance pricing agreements?
Advance pricing agreements (“APAs”) could provide taxpayers and revenue authorities with some certainty during the unprecedented times that we are living in. The African APA landscape is however underdeveloped, but some recent developments in South Africa (“SA”) indicate that this may be changing. On 18 December 2020, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and […]
New transfer pricing requirements in Italy
On 26 November 2021, the Italian tax authorities (“ITA”) issued the final version of Circular Letter no.15/E (the “Circular”), providing clarification on the new transfer pricing requirements introduced by Measure no. 360494 (“New Measure”) on 23 November 2020. This article analyses the most important amendments to the transfer pricing documentation rules in Italy, and what […]
Nigeria’s simplified compliance regime for non-resident suppliers
Many tax jurisdictions encounter difficulties exercising their tax legislation against taxpayers who do not reside in their jurisdictions. The adoption of a simplified registration and collection mechanism is one of the approaches suggested by the OECD to address these difficulties. The simplified compliance regime is more appropriate for business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions as most B2C customers […]
BEPS 2.0: The future impact on businesses in Singapore
Rapid digitalisation and globalisation have led to significant changes in business operations. The digital economy has also uncovered vulnerabilities in the basic rules that have governed global taxation in the past, creating opportunities for profits to be “shifted” to lower-taxed jurisdictions, and sparking debates surrounding a ‘fair’ allocation of taxing rights. Against this backdrop, the […]
South African approach to BEPS and transfer pricing in light of Covid-19
The South African (“SA”) tax regime is being strengthened by the implementation of base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) action 4, relating to the limitation of interest deductions, but extra borrowings by businesses to deal with Covid-19 has caused the Government to defer its introduction. This article highlights some aspects relating to the implementation of […]
Agreement on OECD pillar 1 and 2 proposals (as refined by the US initiative)
As of 13 July, 132 of 139 jurisdictions (including Bermuda, Cayman Islands, BVI, Switzerland, and the Bahamas) agreed to the OECD Pillar 1 and 2 proposals as refined by the US initiative. The seven that did not were: Ireland, Estonia, Hungary, Barbados, Kenya, Nigeria, Sri Lanka. The OECD press release can be found here and […]
Tax aspects of opening a business hub in Asia
The Asian Development Bank has forecast that developing Asia’s growth is forecast to rebound to 7.3% in 2021 and 5.3% in 2022. This compares to 4.2% and 4.4% respectively for Europe (see here) and 6.9% and 3.6% for the US (see here). Businesses already with a footprint in the Asian region will be gearing up their operations to deal with the region’s expected […]
The latest transfer pricing updates on Europe, Asia and America
This article identifies the different types of documentation requirements in three macro-areas (i.e., Pan Europe, Asia-Pacific and America) and it explains the thresholds used for the different taxpayers’ obligations. In addition, it provides an overview of the administrative penalties imposed. The countries analysed in the article are the following: Pan European: France, Germany, Hungary, the […]
Transfer Pricing: Is Africa ready for advance pricing agreements?
Advance pricing agreements (“APAs”) could provide taxpayers and revenue authorities with some certainty during the unprecedented times that we are living in. The African APA landscape is however underdeveloped, but some recent developments in South Africa (“SA”) indicate that this may be changing. On 18 December 2020, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and […]
DAC 6 developments, deadlines, and the question of legal privilege
While the first reporting deadlines for most EU members expired on 31 January 2021 and respectively 28 February 2021, there are still questions outstanding about whether intermediaries are obliged to report arrangements to tax authorities, or if they can use the right to waiver due to professional privilege. In 2020, countries across Europe implemented into […]
Africa is gearing up to fight base erosion and profit shifting
The African continent boasts a beautiful and diverse array of countries offering a wide range of valuable natural and human resources to the world economy. The past decade has seen significant foreign investments in African jurisdictions, ranging from massive investments in Mozambique’s gas reserves to tech companies capitalising on the technical excellence offered by software […]
OECD recommendations on comparability analysis during Covid-19 (Part 2)
Covid-19 has brought unprecedented social and economic challenges that will durably impact the world economy. Specifically, the pandemic has surrounded the Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) with many issues to be managed such as: insufficient cash flows, unpredictable profitability, unreliable third-party data (which is at the heart of arm’s length principle), non-operative supply chains, import/export limitations, possible […]
OECD recommendations on comparability analysis during Covid-19 (Part 1)
Covid-19 has brought unprecedented social and economic challenges that will durably impact the world economy. Specifically, the pandemic has surrounded the Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) with many issues to be managed such as: insufficient cash flows, unpredictable profitability, unreliable third-party data (which is at the heart of arm’s length principle), non-operative supply chains, import/export limitations, possible […]
Developments in transfer pricing documentation
(Updated 30 March 2021) Recent developments in transfer pricing documentation requirements should prompt MNCs to reassess management of cross border tax compliance. With a focus on protecting tax revenues in straightened economic times, many jurisdictions are focussing on transfer pricing compliance and raising awareness of documentation requirements and penalties for non-compliance. This indicates the groundwork […]
Shining the spotlight on more rigorous Transfer Pricing behaviour
While 2020 is a year we may all wish to forget, changes made during the year on Transfer Pricing (TP) give us some clues as to the primary drivers of TP behaviour in 2021. These clues include US guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on TP documentation, highlighting the penalty risks; OECD work and […]
Mazars provides comments on the OECD proposals for taxation of the digitalized economy
Mazars has submitted comments in response to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD”) public consultation on its proposal for taxation of the digitalized economy, released last October. The proposals The OECD project refers to challenges associated with, and proposals to address, the taxation of the digitalized economy. It includes proposals for reforming international […]
Transfer pricing guidelines on financial transactions – have captives been caught?
In February of this year, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released guidance for multinational enterprises (MNE’s) and tax authorities, on applying the arm’s-length standard to controlled financial transactions. The guidance, which the OECD plans to include in the next publication of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (OECD TPG), […]
OECD guidance about the transfer pricing implications of the Covid-19 pandemic
The OECD released its guidance on the transfer pricing implications of the Covid-19 pandemic on 18 December 2020. This guidance was eagerly awaited by many MNEs whose statutory accounts will be closed by the end of the year, and which need to adjust their 2020 transfer pricing policies to reflect the financial impact of the […]
South Africa and others: broadening the tax base by clamping down on “white collar schemes”
Near-term objective of the South African Revenue Service confirmed: “Remaining focused on international taxes, particularly aggressive tax planning using transfer pricing.” The South African (“SA”) economy, like many others, has been severely impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic. A recent speech by the country’s Finance Minister painted a dire picture of a country that is, in […]
The impact of Covid-19 on transfer pricing
The Covid-19 pandemic has far-reaching consequences, and will have serious implications on transfer pricing for many multinational enterprises (“MNEs”). This is particularly challenging for businesses to manage due to the current lack of guidance from the OECD. With this guide, we review the impact of Covid-19 on: • Transfer pricing treatment of government aid • […]