EU’s new SAFE initiative to bolster existing tax evasion measures
Tax compliance
EU’s new SAFE initiative to bolster existing tax evasion measures
Fri 13 Jan 2023
The European Commission (EC) launched an initiative on 6 July 2022 concerning the fight against tax evasion and aggressive tax planning. As a result, a public consultation introducing the Securing the Activity Framework of Enablers (SAFE) directive has now been held. The proposed measures could increase compliance costs for all those involved in providing tax advice, whether in the targeted area or not.
Enablers to come under the microscope
For several years, the EC has been tackling the role that enablers, including tax advisers, play in schemes that facilitate aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. The SAFE initiative will coincide with the existing measures in place, namely the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD), which targets taxpayers and the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC6). The latter requires EU intermediaries to provide information to the tax administrations of Member States on cross-border arrangements, which can potentially be used for aggressive tax planning. Such reports would hopefully allow detailed risk assessments to take place and lead to the closure of loopholes by executing legislation. However, these existing measures target action on the taxpayer and thus they do not cover those that enable such structures.
Tax evasion continues to be an issue
Even though there are several measures in place to tackle tax evasion, it remains a prominent issue. As detailed in the EU’s ‘Call for Evidence’, tax evasion is estimated at between €35bn and €70bn of lost tax revenues per year. According to research conducted by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) on Panama and Pandora, complex structures often involve shell companies that lead to aggressive tax planning and tax evasion.
The overarching objective of the SAFE initiative, as per the Call for Evidence, “is to prohibit enablers who design, market and/or assist in the creation of tax arrangements or schemes in non-EU countries that lead to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning for the EU Member States”.
Measures under consideration
Three options are now being considered. The first option would require enablers to conduct due diligence on whether a scheme will lead to tax evasion and aggressive tax planning and maintain proper records of such procedures. It will also prohibit them from assisting in schemes that would facilitate tax evasion and aggressive tax planning.
Under the second option, enablers would be required to carry out due diligence outlined in option one. In addition, enablers that provide tax advice and services would be required to register in an EU Member State. Therefore, only those registered would be able to provide such services in the EU. If enablers are non-compliant, they may be removed from the register.
Finally, option three requires all enablers to follow a Code of Conduct which obliges enablers to ensure that they do not facilitate tax evasion or aggressive tax planning.
Regardless of the chosen policy option, a further transparency measure may be put in place. This would require that EU taxpayers declare in their annual tax returns any participation involving 25% of shares, voting rights, ownership interest, bearer shareholdings or control via other means in a non-listed company located outside the EU.
Key observations and takeaways
While the DAC6 regime provides information on the use of defined tax planning arrangements that could be used for aggressive tax planning or tax evasion, it has no impact on non-EU enablers. The introduction of SAFE resolves this as it would affect non-EU enablers. Points that may be taken into account in developing the SAFE initiative include the implementation of a system following the example set by the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). FATCA requires foreign financial institutions and certain other entities to report on the assets held by their account holders operating within the scope of the EU. This is considered to be an extra-territorial compliance regime.
Further points to consider include the pending verdicts from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on current EU DAC6 cases. Also, consideration of what role the term ‘economic substance’ will play in the definition of aggressive tax planning.
Cause and effect
The public consultation has led to EU-wide calls to provide more regulation and supervision on the tax profession and unclarified legislation. There is now a call for clear guidelines on tax enablers and what constitutes aggressive tax planning, along with repercussions for such behaviour. Prior to this consultation, the EU considered tax regulation to be the responsibility of the member nations. However, the call for more transparent measurements to be laid out by the EC will allow for a more general methodology and legislation to create resilience to combat the use of aggressive tax planning.
The measures proposed aim to limit the activity of enablers providing tax advice that could result in cases of aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. The options proposed in the consultation focus on measures requiring assessment of whether a structure will lead to tax evasion that involves illegal acts by perpetrators. In one sense any structure might be used for tax evasion, so it seems difficult to determine the dividing line between what might or might not lead to such behaviour. In addition, most EU Member States already have measures to tackle tax evasion and most existing professional bodies to which tax advisers belong already have codes of conduct.
Taking account of the complex issues to consider in any tax planning, the potentially broad scope of the proposed measures requires scrutiny to assess whether they are effective in reducing losses from tax evasion and unacceptable tax avoidance. The effects of the measures will impact many client structures and have additional effects on businesses, individuals and investments.
Call to action – next steps
The public consultation closed on 12 October 2022, following which the EC expect to be able to publish a legislative proposal in the first quarter of 2023.
The associated legislation is relevant to businesses and individuals and, as such, it will be important to track the associated developments, particularly in light of some of the leadership changes at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Want to get notified when new blog posts are published?
Subscribe 
The right tax approach: why companies need a tax control framework
Across the globe, an increasing number of companies are developing tax control frameworks to help them stay on top of their taxation, compliance and risk management obligations and objectives. These obligations are continually evolving, driven by a combination of both...
Ecological taxes: new updates in Mexico
Several Mexican states had imposed ecological taxes in order to encourage certain industries to reduce their polluting emissions. In addition, green taxes have recently been imposed as a consequence of the warning issued by the Mexico Climate Initiative (MCI) that Mexico’s carbon dioxide emissions could increase by up to 59.8% by 2050 if the country’s green […]
A basic guide to understanding Pillar 2 GloBE minimum top-up tax rules
As in-scope organisations* embark on a new Pillar 2 Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) journey, having a clearer understanding of how jurisdictions will enact the global minimum 15% tax rule is vital. Notably, while Pillar 2 GloBE sets out model rules on what jurisdictions need to achieve, there is an element of flexibility in how each […]
IAS accounting requirements for Pillar 2: GloBE for periods ending 31 December 2023
Background to Pillar 2 (GloBE) Part of the ongoing work of the OECD to combat tax avoidance and targeted at low tax jurisdictions, the Pillar 2 – GloBE rules will apply to large organisations (>€750m of global revenue) with each country having its own rules implementing some form of 15% minimum tax, or otherwise risking […]
Green investments in Austria: new tax allowance introduced effective 2023
When the Austrian government – a coalition between the conservative People’s Party and the Green Party – presented their government program for 2020-2024, an “eco-social tax reform” was one of the key elements. The most recent measure has been the introduction of an investment allowance that especially incentivises “green investments”. The two main pillars of […]
How CARF, MiCA, and DAC8 will impact tax transparency in relation to the WEB 3 and other recent web developments
The development of new web communication systems such as WEB3 is making it very difficult for tax authorities to trace taxable transactions. However, measures proposed by the OECD and the European Union aim to provide a framework that will permit traceability of tax transactions. The technical characteristics of a crypto asset make it difficult for […]
ATAD3 update: significant amendments recommended by the European Parliament
The European Parliament proposes significant amendments to the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, commonly known as ATAD3. ATAD3 seeks to prevent the misuse of shell companies for tax purposes. Compared to the initial draft Directive, the proposed amendments may provide relief for international organisations. In essence, ATAD3 imposes increased reporting obligations and denial of tax benefits under […]
Mexico approves the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) to implement Tax Treaty Measures
On 12 October 2022, the Mexican Government approved the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) related to the application rules for double taxation agreements (DTAs) to prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). The rules were published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on 22 November 2022. Included in the Mexican Government’s reservations and notifications are […]
Proposed changes to the offshore regime for passive income in Hong Kong
Background To address harmful tax competition, the European Union (“EU”) requires Member States to refrain from introducing any new harmful tax measures and amend any laws or practices deemed to be harmful. Regarding non-EU jurisdictions, the EU has also evaluated their tax regimes against international tax standards and put in place a list of noncooperative […]
The Google tax: The UK story, 7 years later
The Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), or what the media have dubbed the Google tax, was introduced in 2015 to dissuade and counteract contrived arrangements used by large multinational groups that divert profits from the UK and erode the UK tax base.
The impact of digital assets and cryptocurrencies decentralised finance on taxation in various jurisdictions
Digital assets and cryptocurrencies continue to evolve by offering new services and products such as Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”), but is tax legislation also keeping up to date with the ever-changing world of digital assets and cryptocurrencies?
Are you ready for the GloBE tax challenges?
On 14 March 2022, the OECD published a comprehensive commentary and illustrative examples of how implementing the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (GloBE rules) could look. In this blog, we discuss the GloBE rules and examine how the rules apply and filing requirements. On 20 December 2021, the OECD published model rules that member countries […]
Environmental tax pillar in the environmental, social, and governance system
The information regarding environmental taxes paid by an organisation, as well as the actions taken to mitigate the impact on the environment could be included in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting. Environmental reporting in total is an important element for parties to consider when doing business. Along with environmental reporting, environmental taxes play a […]
Tax compliance and incentives during martial law in Ukraine
A crucial number of Ukrainian companies (including subsidiaries of international enterprises) experienced negative business and financial impacts as a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine which started on 24 February 2022. The urgent relocation of staff to other regions of Ukraine and abroad, interruption of access to internal databases, IT systems, and paper documents […]
The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive II: Will other jurisdictions follow the UK’s lead?
ATAD II is the EU translation of BEPS Action 2, the part which is focused on the ability of taxpayers to design situations of double non-taxation or heavily reduced taxation by exploiting hybrid mismatches. They apply to mismatches between the EU Member States, the UK, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, and third countries. This legislation has […]
Compliance bulletin helps businesses in Mexico
Mazars experts around the world deliver tailored services in audit, accounting, tax, financial advisory, consulting, and legal services. In Mexico, local experts have created a compliance dashboard with news items to help guide businesses as they navigate issues related to finance, tax, legal, and labour updates. With the global economy recovering from Covid-19, new government-required procedures […]
Brexit impact on in/outbound payments
When the UK finally left the EU ended on 31 December 2020, the application of provisions that have been beneficial to cross-border payments within the EU ceased, or will cease to apply. The elimination of withholding taxes, formerly part of these provisions, means companies with cross-border dividend, interest and royalty payment flows to or from […]