Where is the UK Diverted Profits Tax and the Profit Diversion Compliance Facility now?
Transfer pricing
Where is the UK Diverted Profits Tax and the Profit Diversion Compliance Facility now?
Mon 17 Apr 2023
On 7 February 2023, the UK tax authority HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) released its Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits tax statistics for the 2021 – 2022 tax year. The statistics clearly demonstrate that both transfer pricing and Diverted Profits Tax (DPT) continue to yield significant income for HMRC and that these areas are likely to remain high on HMRC’s agenda.
This blog focuses on DPT and what it means for international groups.
DPT was introduced in 2015 to target large groups which were perceived to be using contrived arrangements to divert profits outside of the UK tax net. DPT was not only a means to recover tax revenues which had been artificially diverted away from the UK but an attempt to change the behaviour of large corporates.
How do the rules apply?
Scope
Whilst it interacts closely with transfer pricing, DPT does not form part of the corporate tax legislation and is a separate, distinct tax.
It is charged at a rate of 25% (increasing to 31% when the rate of corporation tax increases to 25% on 1 April 2023), and applies to large companies in two scenarios:
- Where the UK subsidiary (or permanent establishment) of a group is party to arrangements with another group company and those arrangements lack economic substance and were put in place to achieve a tax benefit for the group; or
- Where an overseas party (person or company) carries on activities related to its trade in the UK in a way which has been designed to ensure that no UK taxable presence arises and there was a motive of achieving a tax benefit.
The charge does not apply in the first case if a UK subsidiary is involved and both it and the non-UK entity are not SMEs. In the second case (avoiding a UK taxable presence), there is no charge if UK revenues do not exceed £10m or UK related expenses do not exceed £1m.
The DPT charge
The charging provisions within the DPT legislation are complex. In part, they consider the transfer pricing position and in part they require groups to calculate the profit that would have arisen in the UK in the alternative arrangement which would have been in place absent any tax reduction being available.
HMRC’s view is that no DPT will arise where the transfer pricing is correct or where a group agrees to make an appropriate transfer pricing adjustment. Whilst our experience is that this is often the case, it remains that the charging provisions must be worked through in detail and the transfer pricing position fully tested before any firm conclusions can be reached as to whether a DPT charge exists.
Administration
If a company is within the scope of DPT and does not satisfy any exemptions (including that no DPT charge arises) then it is required to file a notification to HMRC within three months following the end of the accounting period in point. If it considers that there may be a DPT liability, HMRC will then issue a preliminary notice to the company.
Where a company has filed a DPT notification with HMRC, HMRC have a period of two years from the end of the relevant accounting period to issue the preliminary notice. Where the company has failed to file a DPT notification, this period extends to four years.
Following receipt of a preliminary notice, the company will have the opportunity to correct any factual errors in the preliminary notice prior to HMRC issuing a final charging notice which will state the DPT it considers to be due. The DPT must then be paid in full. There are no provisions which allow for payment of the DPT to be postponed.
Following payment, a 15-month review period will commence, during which the company can discuss the amount of DPT due with HMRC. If the company agrees to make a transfer pricing adjustment during the review period, the DPT charge will be removed. This link between the DPT and transfer pricing legislation is important because it provides groups with the opportunity to correct the tax position through an adjustment charged at normal corporation tax rates as opposed to the penal DPT rate.
Once the review period ends, the company may formally appeal the DPT charge. Appeals are heard by the Tax Tribunal and, if successful, it is only at this point that the company will receive a refund of the DPT which has already been paid.
The 2021-2022 statistics
Turning back to HMRC’s statistics for the tax year 2021-2022, it is clear that DPT continues to be an area which HMRC places focus on, eight years after it came into force.
Tax take
Since its introduction, the DPT net amount received by HMRC (being the DPT received from charging and supplementary notices and not subsequently repaid) exceeds £700m. Where DPT is repaid, this will normally be because additional Corporation Tax has subsequently been paid through a transfer pricing adjustment agreed in settlement of an enquiry, therefore the impact of the DPT is even wider than its £700m tax take suggests.
£198m of this tax was received during 2021-2022. This is the second highest yield since DPT came into force, demonstrating that HMRC’s appetite for using DPT to target profit diversion remains strong.
Notifications and HMRC notices
Over the past 8 years, more than 400 DPT notifications have been filed with HMRC by companies which believe they are involved in arrangements that may be in scope of the DPT legislation. 30 of those notifications were filed during 2021-2022.
Indicative of HMRC’s activity in this area, 49 preliminary notices were issued during 2021-2022 (in other words notices were issued to more than just those taxpayers who filed a pro-active notification) and all of those preliminary notices were subsequently issued as final charging notices.
The Profit Diversion Compliance Facility (PDCF)
In January 2019, HMRC launched the Provide Diversion Compliance Facility (PDCF). The PDCF was designed to encourage international groups with arrangements that potentially fall within the scope of DPT to review their TP policies, make appropriate changes and put forward to HMRC a report with proposals to pay any additional tax, interest and penalties due.
The PDCF encourages open and co-operative dialogue between taxpayers and HMRC and is intended to accelerate the process for reaching agreement when compared to the traditional enquiry mechanism. This is demonstrated by the average PDCF case lasting 16.5 months as compared to the 34 months taken to resolve the average transfer pricing enquiry.
Since its introduction, HMRC has been identifying and writing to specific groups which it believes could be in scope of the DPT rules to invite them to register for the PDCF.
In total, HMRC have written to 165 groups with 30 of those letters having been issued in 2021-2022. 23 groups registered for the PDCF during 2021-2022, with 118 having registered in total since the PDCF was introduced. Over £516m additional tax revenue has been secured from resolution proposals. Given its close relationship with the DPT legislation, the tax revenues generated by the PDCF can be viewed in part as relating to DPT.
Most registrants who did not reach an agreement with HMRC under the PDCF (and those who received letters inviting them to register but chose not to) are currently in the process of an HMRC enquiry.
Conclusion
DPT was introduced as a means to capture the tax from profits which have been artificially diverted away from the UK. The penal tax rate and the cash flow disadvantage that comes from dealing with a DPT notice were intentionally designed to encourage a change in behaviour from taxpayers and to provide an incentive to international groups to be more transparent and pro-active in their dealings with HMRC. The introduction of the PDCF four years ago reinforces this objective.
The 2022-2023 tax year statistics which HMRC released last month demonstrate that DPT and transfer pricing continue to be valuable and successful tools for HMRC. It is clear that international groups operating to any extent in the UK need to keep compliance with these areas of tax front of mind.
Want to get notified when new blog posts are published?
Subscribe 
Transfer pricing legislation in the Republic of Moldova
For the first time, the Republic of Moldova has introduced the Tax Code provisions on transfer pricing and the arm’s length principle. These measures are expected to apply from 1 January 2024, with an aim to bring local legislation closer to both the EU law and the recommendations of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and […]
ESG and financial transactions from a transfer pricing perspective
In 2021, the European Central Bank (ECB) published its final guide on climate-related and environmental risks for banks. It aimed at enhancing the industry’s awareness and preparedness for managing climate-related and environmental risks. The risks mentioned are commonly related to two main types: physical risk and transition risk. They have an impact on both economic […]
Protecting reputation and managing communication on tax matters for ESG ratings and Pillar 2 disclosures
Over the last decade, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU) have made significant developments regarding tax transparency regimes and the exchange of information between tax authorities. However, these developments are being taken further in the drive for increased transparency and public availability of such information, particularly in relation […]
What is the future of taxation in Europe: questioning the usefulness of all anti-avoidance measures
Pillar 2, which is the Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules (GloBE) minimum tax project, and the BEFIT initiatives are considered likely to reduce some tax planning opportunities respectively at worldwide and EU levels, and thus reduce the need to address them through anti-avoidance rules. Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider whether all these anti-avoidance rules […]
What is the future of taxation in Europe: impact on multinational enterprises
Initiatives mentioned in the previous article already affect and will further affect multinational companies in a significant way. The first step for multinational companies to consider is how to build stakeholders’ understanding of the impact these changes in domestic legislation will have on the business. In the case of Pillar 2, for example, this means […]
What is the future of taxation in Europe: state of play for ongoing initiatives
The international tax landscape has undergone major changes over the past few years which is set to have a significant impact on the overall tax architecture. At both international and European Union (EU) levels, several initiatives have been pursued aimed at aligning tax collection with the location of economic activity and achieve a minimum level […]
The impact of rising interest rates on transfer pricing
With rising inflation and multiple key interest rate increases, multinational enterprises should consider reviewing the prices of their intercompany financing transactions, which may no longer align with the arm’s length principle. The quick rise in interest rates may have created significant divergence between the prices applied by a multinational enterprise on its intercompany financing transactions […]
Can Turkey make progress on transfer pricing audits?
National differences and approaches to transfer pricing are evident all over the world. In particular, tax jurisdictions in developed countries have now taken quite advanced steps in approaching complex transfer pricing situations from a technical debate perspective. Whereas in some countries, including Turkey, the concept of transfer pricing could be more advanced. Although Turkey has […]
Latest development of APA in China – simplified procedures of unilateral APA
Background The State Administration of Taxation (“STA”) has made a continuous effort to promote Advanced Pricing Arrangement (“APA”). On 26 July 2021, the STA issued STA Public Notice [2021] No.241 (“Bulletin 24”), which sets forth simplified procedures for unilateral APA for enterprises that meet certain conditions. On 29 October 2021, it also published the China […]
New CEE tax guide outlines fundamental changes and long-term trends
Providing information on taxation in 22 Central and Eastern European (CEE) states, the latest Mazars CEE tax guide analyses long-term taxation trends and fundamental tax regime changes in each country, both now and in previous years.
The Google tax: The UK story, 7 years later
The Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), or what the media have dubbed the Google tax, was introduced in 2015 to dissuade and counteract contrived arrangements used by large multinational groups that divert profits from the UK and erode the UK tax base.
New Transfer Pricing Bill Passed in Israel
Transfer Pricing Bill in Israel passes third reading in June 2022 and is approved. What are the implications for businesses in Israel? In June 2022, the new transfer pricing bill was approved. This is another step towards the Israel Tax Authorities (ITA) efforts to streamline the ITA’s supervision and control of transfer pricing relating to […]
Questions raised on Italy’s penalty protection regime
Following Italy’s new transfer pricing (TP) requirements1 introduced on 23 November 2020, there has been much discussion as to whether the taxpayer may benefit from penalty protection that also covers additional withholding tax otherwise due when the Italian tax authorities (ITA) perform adjustments that recharacterise the nature of a transaction. A Circular2 letter was then […]
Are you ready for the GloBE tax challenges?
On 14 March 2022, the OECD published a comprehensive commentary and illustrative examples of how implementing the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (GloBE rules) could look. In this blog, we discuss the GloBE rules and examine how the rules apply and filing requirements. On 20 December 2021, the OECD published model rules that member countries […]
Turkey issued the first legislation in relation to the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP)
With Law No. 7338 on Turkish Tax Procedure Law (TPL) and Amending Certain Laws (“Law No. 7338”) published in the Official Gazette dated October 26, 2021, a domestic regulation was made for the first time regarding the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) in Turkey. The Turkish Revenue Administration (TRA) aims to eliminate uncertainties regarding the application […]
What to expect from South Africa’s advance pricing agreement programme
A proposed model for establishing an advance pricing agreement (“APA”) programme in South Africa (“SA”) was issued by the South African Revenue Authority (“SARS”) during December 2021. This article highlights some notable aspects of this proposed programme, by comparing it to those of other jurisdictions. An APA is an agreement between a taxpayer and a […]
Takeaways from the latest edition of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines
On 20 January 2022, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released the 2022 edition of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (OECD TPG). This blog provides a summary of the revised Chapters of the OECD TPG, and highlights what tax advisors and taxpayers need to know. The revised […]
Transfer pricing: is Africa ready for advance pricing agreements?
Advance pricing agreements (“APAs”) could provide taxpayers and revenue authorities with some certainty during the unprecedented times that we are living in. The African APA landscape is however underdeveloped, but some recent developments in South Africa (“SA”) indicate that this may be changing. On 18 December 2020, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and […]
New transfer pricing requirements in Italy
On 26 November 2021, the Italian tax authorities (“ITA”) issued the final version of Circular Letter no.15/E (the “Circular”), providing clarification on the new transfer pricing requirements introduced by Measure no. 360494 (“New Measure”) on 23 November 2020. This article analyses the most important amendments to the transfer pricing documentation rules in Italy, and what […]
Nigeria’s simplified compliance regime for non-resident suppliers
Many tax jurisdictions encounter difficulties exercising their tax legislation against taxpayers who do not reside in their jurisdictions. The adoption of a simplified registration and collection mechanism is one of the approaches suggested by the OECD to address these difficulties. The simplified compliance regime is more appropriate for business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions as most B2C customers […]
BEPS 2.0: The future impact on businesses in Singapore
Rapid digitalisation and globalisation have led to significant changes in business operations. The digital economy has also uncovered vulnerabilities in the basic rules that have governed global taxation in the past, creating opportunities for profits to be “shifted” to lower-taxed jurisdictions, and sparking debates surrounding a ‘fair’ allocation of taxing rights. Against this backdrop, the […]
South African approach to BEPS and transfer pricing in light of Covid-19
The South African (“SA”) tax regime is being strengthened by the implementation of base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) action 4, relating to the limitation of interest deductions, but extra borrowings by businesses to deal with Covid-19 has caused the Government to defer its introduction. This article highlights some aspects relating to the implementation of […]
Key transfer pricing considerations for startups
Startups and entrepreneurship are concepts that have recently grown more important globally. To put it simply, startups are entrepreneurial companies that are generally established to offer solutions to any problem and exhibit rapid growth potential. In many countries, the importance of technology-oriented startup business models is gradually increasing, and a rising number of “unicorns”[1] are […]
Agreement on OECD pillar 1 and 2 proposals (as refined by the US initiative)
As of 13 July, 132 of 139 jurisdictions (including Bermuda, Cayman Islands, BVI, Switzerland, and the Bahamas) agreed to the OECD Pillar 1 and 2 proposals as refined by the US initiative. The seven that did not were: Ireland, Estonia, Hungary, Barbados, Kenya, Nigeria, Sri Lanka. The OECD press release can be found here and […]
Tax aspects of opening a business hub in Asia
The Asian Development Bank has forecast that developing Asia’s growth is forecast to rebound to 7.3% in 2021 and 5.3% in 2022. This compares to 4.2% and 4.4% respectively for Europe (see here) and 6.9% and 3.6% for the US (see here). Businesses already with a footprint in the Asian region will be gearing up their operations to deal with the region’s expected […]
The latest transfer pricing updates on Europe, Asia and America
This article identifies the different types of documentation requirements in three macro-areas (i.e., Pan Europe, Asia-Pacific and America) and it explains the thresholds used for the different taxpayers’ obligations. In addition, it provides an overview of the administrative penalties imposed. The countries analysed in the article are the following: Pan European: France, Germany, Hungary, the […]
Transfer Pricing: Is Africa ready for advance pricing agreements?
Advance pricing agreements (“APAs”) could provide taxpayers and revenue authorities with some certainty during the unprecedented times that we are living in. The African APA landscape is however underdeveloped, but some recent developments in South Africa (“SA”) indicate that this may be changing. On 18 December 2020, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and […]
DAC 6 developments, deadlines, and the question of legal privilege
While the first reporting deadlines for most EU members expired on 31 January 2021 and respectively 28 February 2021, there are still questions outstanding about whether intermediaries are obliged to report arrangements to tax authorities, or if they can use the right to waiver due to professional privilege. In 2020, countries across Europe implemented into […]
Africa is gearing up to fight base erosion and profit shifting
The African continent boasts a beautiful and diverse array of countries offering a wide range of valuable natural and human resources to the world economy. The past decade has seen significant foreign investments in African jurisdictions, ranging from massive investments in Mozambique’s gas reserves to tech companies capitalising on the technical excellence offered by software […]
OECD recommendations on comparability analysis during Covid-19 (Part 2)
Covid-19 has brought unprecedented social and economic challenges that will durably impact the world economy. Specifically, the pandemic has surrounded the Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) with many issues to be managed such as: insufficient cash flows, unpredictable profitability, unreliable third-party data (which is at the heart of arm’s length principle), non-operative supply chains, import/export limitations, possible […]
OECD recommendations on comparability analysis during Covid-19 (Part 1)
Covid-19 has brought unprecedented social and economic challenges that will durably impact the world economy. Specifically, the pandemic has surrounded the Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) with many issues to be managed such as: insufficient cash flows, unpredictable profitability, unreliable third-party data (which is at the heart of arm’s length principle), non-operative supply chains, import/export limitations, possible […]
Developments in transfer pricing documentation
(Updated 30 March 2021) Recent developments in transfer pricing documentation requirements should prompt MNCs to reassess management of cross border tax compliance. With a focus on protecting tax revenues in straightened economic times, many jurisdictions are focussing on transfer pricing compliance and raising awareness of documentation requirements and penalties for non-compliance. This indicates the groundwork […]
Shining the spotlight on more rigorous Transfer Pricing behaviour
While 2020 is a year we may all wish to forget, changes made during the year on Transfer Pricing (TP) give us some clues as to the primary drivers of TP behaviour in 2021. These clues include US guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on TP documentation, highlighting the penalty risks; OECD work and […]
Mazars provides comments on the OECD proposals for taxation of the digitalized economy
Mazars has submitted comments in response to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD”) public consultation on its proposal for taxation of the digitalized economy, released last October. The proposals The OECD project refers to challenges associated with, and proposals to address, the taxation of the digitalized economy. It includes proposals for reforming international […]
Transfer pricing guidelines on financial transactions – have captives been caught?
In February of this year, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released guidance for multinational enterprises (MNE’s) and tax authorities, on applying the arm’s-length standard to controlled financial transactions. The guidance, which the OECD plans to include in the next publication of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (OECD TPG), […]
OECD guidance about the transfer pricing implications of the Covid-19 pandemic
The OECD released its guidance on the transfer pricing implications of the Covid-19 pandemic on 18 December 2020. This guidance was eagerly awaited by many MNEs whose statutory accounts will be closed by the end of the year, and which need to adjust their 2020 transfer pricing policies to reflect the financial impact of the […]
South Africa and others: broadening the tax base by clamping down on “white collar schemes”
Near-term objective of the South African Revenue Service confirmed: “Remaining focused on international taxes, particularly aggressive tax planning using transfer pricing.” The South African (“SA”) economy, like many others, has been severely impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic. A recent speech by the country’s Finance Minister painted a dire picture of a country that is, in […]
The impact of Covid-19 on transfer pricing
The Covid-19 pandemic has far-reaching consequences, and will have serious implications on transfer pricing for many multinational enterprises (“MNEs”). This is particularly challenging for businesses to manage due to the current lack of guidance from the OECD. With this guide, we review the impact of Covid-19 on: • Transfer pricing treatment of government aid • […]